FTX creditors file class action against bankruptcy lawyers over ties to FTX prior to its collapse

FTX’s bankruptcy law firm Sullivan and Cromwell is facing a class action that alleges it was so closely involved with the exchange prior to its collapse that it should be held partially responsible for its actions.

The class action focuses on the number of times that SC worked as outside counsel for FTX prior to its collapse. Through these dealings, it alleges, the law firm gained knowledge of the exchange’s workings and ultimately supported it in its fraudulent behavior.

“While customers of FTX, Class Members, lost everything, SC was able to gain millions from the FTX fraud. SC served as primary legal counsel to FTX for the 16 months preceding FTX’s collapse, during which time SC billed around $8.5 million in fees,” it says.

The lawsuit alleges that after lawyer Ryne Miller left SC and joined FTX as General Counsel in 2021, he pushed to send business to SC as outside counsel. It claims this resulted in 20 engagements, including FTX’s bid for the assets of crypto exchange Voyager and its acquisition of crypto exchange LedgerX.

It claims that SC represented a special purpose vehicle called Emergent, which was used to buy Robinhood stock with FTX customer money, while also representing former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried himself.

The class action alleges, citing FTX insiders, that Miller became aware of the “back door” in FTX’s platform that enabled it to funnel FTX customer funds to Alameda and that he gave this information to multiple individuals at SC.

The lawsuit also notes the amount that SC has gained by overseeing the FTX bankruptcy proceedings.

“Since taking a leading role, SC’s income from matters related to FTX has surged, exceeding $180 million — or 10% of the total revenue the 900-lawyer firm publicly stated it collected in all of 2022 — with paralegals billing $595/hr. and partners billing up to $2,165/hr,” it says, citing Bloomberg .

SC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Longstanding concerns about SC's role

In January 2023, multiple U.S. Senators expressed concerns that SC is not a disinterested party with respect to the exchange. At the time, they called for an independent examiner to oversee the investigation into the crypto exchange’s collapse.

Around the same time, Bankman-Fried claimed the law firm, “was one of FTX International’s two primary law firms prior to bankruptcy, and was FTX US’s primary law firm,” highlighting that he used to work out of the law firm’s offices. He claimed the law firm pressured the exchange into bankruptcy and strong-armed him into naming its preferred CEO, John Ray III.

The issue was raised in a bankruptcy hearing in January 2023, where creditors claimed that SC could be a target for investigation with its own liability in the bankruptcy case. Despite objections, the judge approved the law firm to be retained for the proceedings. The following month, a request for an independent examiner was denied.

In January 2024, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled that FTX must be investigated by an independent examiner. An investigation by John Ray III is not enough, and an independent probe might shed new light on crypto industry practices, one of the appellate judges wrote in a precedential opinion.